Healthcare Implosion: Healthcare Co-Dependency
Nan Andrews Amish, MBA, CLU
As Dave Lazarus has written in the San Francisco Chronicle,
there is a healthcare implosion in the works, with GM's
union negotiation being one more visible piece of the
implosion. While Dave expresses concern over the pieces
of the health care funding being taken apart he does not
go far enough. Here are some other concerns:
-
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)/high
deductible plans will become the next 401K. Over
the next few years, they will be offered and embraced
by most Fortune 500 companies. Younger, healthier
and wealthier employees will enroll. PPO, HMO
and indemnity health insurances will lose their
actuarial elements of risk sharing as the lowest
risk participants leave the system. PPOs, HMOs
and indemnity plan costs per person will skyrocket
as a result, just like they did after HMOs were
first marketed to the healthiest among us.
Employers will then provide incentives for the
older, less wealthy and less healthy employees
to switch to the HSA/high deductible plans. This
decreases corporate risk placing it squarely on
the shoulders of employee/participants. Risk sharing
with a group of one is risky indeed. The average
low income person, 5 years from now, will now
have to manage the risk of up to 25% of their
total income needing to be available for medical
expenses. Every year. Expect medical bankruptcies
to skyrocket too.
-
Meanwhile, US businesses are
missing opportunities to decrease healthcare costs
by 20-30% per year, by not exploring alternative
paradigms for health.
As an example, most health plans designed to save
employer health costs stress "disease management"
and "educating patients about healthcare costs".
These measures can assist, but do not address
the major causes of the out of control costs.
Other countries around the globe have embraced
models of healing, which are more cost efficient
including, but not limited to single payer and
universal plans. Chronic diseases tend to respond
well to holistic approaches.
Asthma, for example costs this country billions
of dollars each year. Emergency room visits account
for most of these costs. Disease management programs
have decreased emergency room usage by perhaps
20%. Homeopathy is well known in Europe to be
highly effective in not just managing
asthma, but in addressing the cause. The cost
for a complete homeopathic assessment, the typical
three -four visits required to get the homeopathic
treatments right, and the cost of treatments is
less than a single emergency room visit and will
keep annual costs down for years. A recommendation
of asthma patients to homeopathic experts could
decrease the cost of asthma in this country by
over 60%. 60!
Back pain is one of the leading causes of disability
in this country. There are studies that have linked
back pain in middle age to prior auto accidents.
Accident victims who have chiropractic treatments
after the accident, even if they had no pain after
the accident, have a significantly lowered chance
of back pain later in life. This could save millions
of dollars in healthcare, disability, workman's
comp and lost workdays each year.
Elderly persons in nursing homes had less pain
and increased mobility after just one visit with
a student training to be a massage therapist.
With regular visits by licensed practitioners,
mobility increases were greater than reported
with any medication. Yet most health plans in
the US, including workman's comp, limit these
treatments, or do not cover them at all, favoring
and incenting patients to use covered drugs and
surgeries.
-
Last but not least, in the US,
businesses and government have become like co-dependent
family members, who despair at the alcoholic habits
of a loved one, but who enable the alcoholic to
continue to drink, with every move we make. But
it goes farther. As the enablers, we abhor the
traffic fatalities from drunken drivers, but we
keep renewing their driving licenses. We vent
about the wasted potential, then offer offenders
only the best spirits when they visit socially.
Or we offer them apple cider and pretend there
is no problem at all, or that it is someone else's
problem, and not ours.
How do we do this with healthcare?
We support the pharmaceutical industry, with our
insurances, our investments and our benefits practices.
We ignore the fact that side effects from drug
interactions may be the primary cause of death
in the elderly and one of several causes of the
rising cost of healthcare. We fund health practices
designed to provide a flow of revenue to health
providers, not keep workers healthy. We ignore
as "not our business", the data that suggest that
many current "health practices" are costing every
business thousands of dollars per employee. While
we spend 10-30% of our labor costs on health benefits,
we remain ignorant of the components of this cost.
While we were cutting middle management from every
other industry, bringing customers closer to the
business, we happily paid for hundreds of thousands
of new middle management "case managers" and managed
care bureaucracy whose primary job it was to decline
treatment and add layers between the provider
and the patient.
We support federally mandated vaccine schedules
for children of our employees, that guarantee
regular pediatric visits, and thimerisol (mercury)
loads in vaccines given to a 2 day old infant
greater than would be safe for a 250 pound adult
according to EPA standards. Then we look the other
way when autism cases increase from one in 450,000
to one in 150 during the same time period that
vaccines using thimerisol increased thousand fold.
(Autism and mercury poisoning symptoms have pretty
much a 1:1 correlation). While other countries
ban vaccines we mandate, foreign vaccine makers
laugh all the way to the bank, as we approve new
vaccines (flu), mandate them, and then outsource
production to Europe, when we cannot keep up with
demand.
As businesses we do not tolerate poor performance,
yet we tolerate the medical establishment's practices
of shielding and protecting their incompetent colleagues
in a multitude of ways. (80% of malpractice claims
come from about 8% of the physicians.) We tolerate
a "not invented here" mentality by the AMA, that
would have cost us our jobs, had we taken the same
approach in our businesses.
If we as business executives were rigorous in our
examination of how our benefit dollars were spent,
if we did not tolerate poor management of the health
organizations we did business with, if we chose
to support effective protocols even if MDs were
not 100% behind them, and got rid of those with
long term life cycle costs that were inexcusably
high, we could cut healthcare costs by 20-30% in
this country in a matter of two years.
In other words, it is often politically expedient
to support your fellow business executives. But
when their decisions are costing you your competitive
advantage due to uncontrollable cost increases,
stressing your labor relations and talent decisions
and impacting employee and customer satisfaction,
it is time to take another look, and explore ways
to stop the co-dependency. Now.
(1161
words) Copyright © 2005-2008 Nan Andrews Amish. All
rights reserved.
Permission to reprint this article is granted, provided
original author is given credit, and contact information
and mini bio are provided as follows:
|
Author: Nan Andrews Amish, MBA, CLU
Big Picture Healthcare
 |
|
Nan Andrews Amish is a management consultant,
facilitator and speaker with expertise in healthcare
economics and market research. Nan Andrews Amish
and Big Picture Healthcare offer facilitation,
member surveys, management assessments, tools,
workshops and keynote addresses to help associations,
leaders and teams increase their effectiveness
by seeing the Big Picture Perspective.
|
The Big Woman with the Big Picture Perspective.
phone: 650 560-9800 toll-free 800 858-1750
www.bigpicturehealthcare.com
|
|